|
Friday 5 March
SALVATION ARMY FIGHTS FOR OFFICIAL RECOGNITION IN RUSSIA
by Geraldine Fagan, Keston News Service
Despite well-organised and wide-reaching aid programmes throughout
the CIS, the Salvation Army was relieved not to have been chosen as
one of the distributors for 625 million dollars of US aid to Russia,
Captain JENNIFER FAGERSTOM, a young American officer, told Keston
News Service on 9 February.
The efficiency of this worldwide Christian movement is evident from
the scale on which it provides solace to the people of Russia,
Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia: according to its estimates for a single
year, the organisation materially assisted over 23,000 families;
visited almost 14,000 housebound elderly or invalids; made over
40,000 hospital and prison visits and counselled over 18,000
individuals and 6,000 children faced with problem such as abandonment
or family break-up. Every day 2,200 homeless and refugees are given a
hot meal through its feeding programmes. Yet despite such a high
profile in the region the Salvation Army sometimes has to fight to
gain acceptance for its work: Captain Fagerstrom described how most
foreign-based humanitarian aid is now confined to Moldova and Georgia
as a result of customs complications in Russia. 'We have to make sure
that we get the approval of Russian customs before the ship leaves,
as sometimes they won't let it enter when it arrives. Much depends on
the individual customs agent. We don't have the staff time to lobby
to change this - we've acquiesced to them.� The principal problem
appears to be that the authorities fear the aid will be sold, so
great effort has to go into proving that it will be given away. For
this reason financial donations are preferred - 'it becomes an
investment in their economy' - rather than gifts in kind, such as a
recent huge donation of soup cups to St Petersburg. By contrast, it
is still possible to import medical supplies, such as crutches or
zimmer frames, to Moldova without obstacle, something which would be
problematic in Russia.
One way to gain acceptance might be to be seen as an indigenous
organisation, and Captain Fagerstrom says that although most of the
Salvation Army's funding comes from international sources, there are
concerted efforts to transform it into a national organisation: 'We
are now trying to get funds from inside Russia. In time we will leave
and nationals will take over - at present it is 50-50.�
Another problem is obtaining accreditation from the authorities.
Keston News Service has reported that the Salvation Army's lawyers
advised them to register solely as a charity following the passing of
the 1997 law on religion, (See KNS, Salvation Army Continues Its Work
in St Petersburg, 24 February 1998) but Captain Fagerstrom says that
the organisation is currently simultaneously going through the
process of becoming a registered religious organisation and the
process of gaining a charity passport. 'If you register as a charity
you cannot do religious work. If you register as a religious
organisation first, you can do both. We want to be registered as both
so as to be able to do more.' Charitable status is not strictly
necessary, but Captain Fagerstrom says there is so much concern about
the number of bogus charities that 'if we are registered, it means
that we do what we say we do'. There are also tax benefits on
donations for registered charities.
Captain Fagerstrom is confident that the Salvation Army will receive
registration as a religious organisation within the next few months:
'The process is almost complete... but there has been a lot of
bureaucracy in making sure that the wording in the application is
right.� She believes that once the organisation is registered in
three cities it will receive all-Russian status in accordance with
the 1997 law and thus be exempt from the requirement to reregister
new branches.
The Salvation Army had trouble getting official recognition in Russia
before the Bolshevik Revolution. When the first missionary, a Swede,
started preaching in St Petersburg in 1890 he was promptly sent to
Siberia, and in a meeting on 6 April 1909 in Buckingham Palace, the
Russian Empress Mariya Fedorovna told Salvation Army founder William
Booth that she feared the Salvation Army's presence in Russia
signified the formation of a new Christian sect in conflict with the
Russian Orthodox Church, which the Russian authorities viewed as
extremely undesirable. It was only following the February Revolution
of 1917 that the Salvation Army was able to function legally in
Russia, and they were asked to leave in 1923. They were not invited
back until 1991.
Despite this history, Captain Fagerstrom believes that the Salvation
Army will have no problem in obtaining registration. She thinks it
will be easy to find documentation proving that the organisation was
active in Russia before the communist clampdown, and she does not
consider threats of expulsion from two meeting halls in St Petersburg
immediately after the new law was passed to be significant (See KNS,
St Petersburg Authorities Crack Down on Salvation Army, 15 October
1997). Why was she so confident about the favourable attitude of the
authorities? 'The government has never praised us - but, unlike some
other organisations, they have not tried to obstruct us; one
organisation told us that they had been constantly harassed. Because
we have never had problems we take that to mean "We know you're
credible".'
The Salvation Army describes itself as 'an evangelical part of the
universal Christian Church', but under the new law it will be
registered as its own denomination. However, according to Captain
Fagerstrom it cooperates with many other groups, both secular and
religious, including - albeit unofficially - Orthodox in central and
outer Moscow. However, she refused to give any further details for
fear of creating trouble for her Orthodox partners: 'The Moscow
Patriarchate would never admit that it is happening, and the
individual parishes would not like to be advertised.� Was it any
particular kind of parish that was prepared to work alongside the
Salvation Army in activities such as soup distribution? 'No, it
depends upon the situation and openness of the particular priest.�
Keston asked what the reaction of the Salvation Army had been to the
US government's recent decision to grant 625 million dollars of
humanitarian aid to Russia in the knowledge that it will be
distributed partly by the Russian Orthodox Church. Surely the
Salvation Army had the necessary expertise to distribute such aid?
Did they feel overlooked? 'We have mixed feelings about it. It would
require huge amounts of time and staff. In another sense it was a
disappointment - no reasoning was given as to why the groups that
were chosen had been chosen. They haven't been open about the
decision-making process: Our representative did attend the planning
meetings and gave a presentation, but the decision still surprised
us'. Overall, however, she concluded that it was a relief not to be
responsible for distributing the aid: 'We have limited personnel to
do such a huge distribution'.
When asked whether she thought the Russian Orthodox Church would be
able to do the work any better, Captain Fagerstrom was clearly
reluctant to criticise the Moscow Patriarchate. 'Some of their
programmes are very limited, but they have churches and existing
programmes everywhere. We have nothing in Siberia, for example, where
they already have that contact made�. She concluded that it was
indeed doubtful that the Russian Orthodox Church had the experience
of the Salvation Army, but added diplomatically, 'that doesn't mean
they can't do a good job.' (END)
|
|